questionsmore problems with the "popular" algorithm

vote-for7vote-against +7 -0

by anotherhiggins
asked 2 years ago

vote-for2vote-against

@anotherhiggins: I definitely noticed that one (having been the first to comment on your original deal) and am likewise confused at the untimely death (RIP, if you will) of the deal.

I'm not sure how exactly the popular algorithm works, but your deduction that the comment count pushed it over to popular seems logical enough... shrug
I suppose dead deals are fair game to be "popular" if people like talking about them. I don't necessarily mind a dead deal showing up there as long as it's interesting...

vote-for2vote-against

@arosiriak: deals that are RIP'd before they hit popular aren't supposed to roll over. There was something wrong.

vote-for3vote-against

@hobbit: And something wrong beyond that was the RIP in first place - it wasn't dead yet! I still got it.

vote-for3vote-against

@arosiriak: someone probably tattled on it and staff didn't check. There seemed to be a lot of that stuff going on yesterday. The wrong duplicate deal was deleted. Hmmmmmm

vote-for2vote-against

I agree with @hobbit, it's not normal for an RIP'd deal to move to Popular. The site's stabiity issues are causing frustration for us and I'd imagine the developers also.

And while you didn't ask this specifically, I think that deals already on Popular which are RIP'd should 'follow the light' after a brief (2 - 6 hour) mourning period...to the end of the Popular pages. They can still be sorted by date order there, of course.

Is there a real benefit to having them take up space on the first 2 - 3 pages of Popular when they are no longer available? They will after all still show up if someone does a search.

vote-for1vote-against

Perhaps this is a bit out there as a suggestion, but maybe rather than just going to the end of the popular pages, deals that are RIP'd can go to their own list (i.e. a new tab: Popular, Fresh, RIP)... Just a thought. They could even have extra stats posted on the deal too.

They'd still be searchable that way too.

vote-for3vote-against

@arosiriak: that was suggested early on before and someone said that then that would throw off the symmetry of the tabs. Because there wouldn't be a corresponding tab in the questions area. At least visual noise wasn't mentioned then. ;)

vote-for2vote-against

I tattled on your RIP'd deal under "Other" asking for it to be revived since it was still functional based on the comments. I noticed that wasn't successful.

vote-for2vote-against

@perkalicious11: Thanks.

I've responded to an email from Jay about an earlier tattle (in which I asked that the price be changed in the title and the instructions be updated) and I also re-Tattled an hour or more ago asking that it be revived and edited. I haven't heard back yet.

The final price has gone up about $5, but <$35 for the David Attenborough version of Life on Blu-ray is still a pretty freaking great deal.

http://deals.woot.com/deals/details/751ada64-bd3f-4f7c-8d0b-c268b8df38a0/life-narrated-by-david-attenborough-on-blu-ray-for-free-shipping#0