Doesn't Woot! allow Novelty Underwear?
Why was the Jumbo the Elephant men's novelty undergarment removed?
Sometimes, sometimes not. We will make that decision on a case by case basis.
So what, specifically, is wrong with Jumbo the Elephant?
@dosquatch: It was inappropriate, and removed accordingly.
@thefenst: In what way is the elephant inappropriate that a naughty schoolgirl is not?
By any chance was this a pair that were g-string with an empty-trunked elephant on the front? If so, you guys just brought back some fun memories of goofy gifts I sent my husband on while he was on cruise years ago. Jeez, I wonder if we still have them...
@lavikinga: Yuppers, that would be the item in question at the moment :o)
@dosquatch: Well those were just silly! Unless they were being modeled and then I could see where that might be a problem.
@lavikinga: See, that's what I thought. The alligator G was on a model. I thought that might have been what pushed it over the line (nevermind that Cheri uses (presumably) live women), so I found Jumbo on a half-manequin and still got shot down.
Maybe Jay took the name personally?
@dosquatch: You know that elephants aren't accepted here, c'mon now...now go find some unicorn underwear to post, lol.
@dosquatch: Maybe you should have chosen the alligator, it would have given the female deal.wooters some eye candy
Maybe if they were modeled on a zombie there wouldn't have been a problem.
@theoneill555: I did post the alligator thong. Twice. I figured that pushed my luck with that particular garment far enough :o) Live model and whatnot. I thought the elephant on a manequin was safer. I seem to have thought wrong. Oh, well :o)
@goldiemcg: Too funny! All new meaning to "horny" ;o)
Stats
- Asked
- Asked By
- dosquatch
- Answered
- 13 times
- Viewed
- 1510 times
- Voted Against
- 0 times
- Voted For
- 2 times
13 Answers answer
Sort By: