questionssuggestion: faq tab in ask the community

vote-for56vote-against
vote-for14vote-against

We have been asking for a deals.woot FAQ forever.

Here is a link to catbertthegreat's original deals.woot user FAQ (a little outdated but still relevant)-

https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AQG8pAVgwWFGZDk3Y3RzNF80emJndnQ3djY&hl=en&pli=1

Here is heymo's attemp -

http://deals.woot.com/questions/details/60912285-b3d7-450b-b297-9a7368e28e48/just-the-faqs-maam-who-feels-like-a-broken-record#22

Maybe one day, shawnmiller will awake to a glorious, warm, sunshiney day in Seattle and say "I am going to design a deals.woot FAQ" (but don't count on it any time soon - we might get sun and warmth sometime in Aug - if we are lucky)

vote-for8vote-against

@theoneill555: Thank you! Apparently the community wants FAQs; the staff is mute on replies. Therein lies part of the problem. An aside: For the purposes of this question, I was only addressing the Ask the Community side. Also believe that deals.woot sorely needs some definitions. Especially the length of time before a deal is automatically RIP'd.

Will mention again - snapster asked the community a question a while ago regarding reinstating chat. Seems no one wanted that again. Then he posed options for the questions area - one of which was to stop using questions in the rep algorithm. I know & understand that he isn't involved in the day to day running of this place. But, when you ask a question, receive answers, should you not let people know your decision? This 'rep' question is now outdated and unanswered.

Apparently, so is the FAQ question. SAD.

vote-for7vote-against

I like the idea, but it is too easy to ask questions, so I think many people will just ask rather than review the FAQ first.

vote-for7vote-against

@gmwhit: Agree. I think FAQ should exist even if it only reduces duplicate questions by a small margin. Also, there are some people who would review an FAQ area but might not ask a question out of fear/confusion so I think FAQ might be good for newer users who may be a little more intimidated, etc.

vote-for6vote-against

I say instead of a FAQ page, we make new users take a quiz before any participation. Questions on this quiz will include things like "Your number of Woots has gone from 6 to 1. This is obviously: A) a glitch B) punishment for not Wooting enough C) a glitch." or "You answer a question on deals.woot and @jumbowoot himself responds! But he has no staff badge! What happened? A) he quit B) he was fired for being so awesome C) glitch." In order to participate, they'll have to answer these types of questions and then get so many right. If the user is caught asking one of these questions again, users can tattle on the offending user to the mods who will then make him/her re-take the quiz.

vote-for5vote-against

Yeah, this has been churning (at least amongst community members) for a long time: http://deals.woot.com/questions/search?q=faq

Maybe FAQ#1 should be: "Why is there not an FAQ?" ... but it would be in an FAQ! FAQception.

vote-for3vote-against

No, I didn't search to see if this ? had been asked before. Guilty. :-( If it has been, then it's apparently old & no action was taken, etc. Am hoping that this might be considered as part of a solution to making the ?'s area easier to use.

vote-for3vote-against

@wnyx585am: I understand what you're saying. :-) If there was such a tab, then the person who asked the question could simply be referred to that link. It might stop some dups, and posssibly avoid the negative votes/answers w/mulitiple (often old) links.