Discuss the Leaderboard
The leaderboard is a way of recognizing users who contribute to Deals.Woot.
Deals.Woot works best when the community is actively contributing through the site's primary function - that is adding deals, voting for good deals, and ignoring poor deals. The leaderboard acts as an incentive that ultimately helps us showcase the best deals.
There are many ways to contribute to Deals.Woot, and consequently, there are many leaderboard statistics. We're fully aware our current set of leaderboard statistics are potentially harmful long-term incentives. We'd like to hear your ideas for new leaderboard statistics.
Suggestions should encourage the community to add good deals they found on the web, not just tons of random crap. They also should encourage the community to vote for the best deals, not just every deal they stumble upon. We're looking for simplicity, things that can be easily described and understood at a glance. Along with your suggestion, suggest a short (3 or 4 word) title.
by
shawnmiller
asked 3 years ago
Suggestion...
Replace most questions asked with most questions answered
Apple Discussions is a good example...
http://discussions.apple.com/index.jspa
Make the data one computer screen wide. If I have to use the bar at the bottom to read the data, you will loose me PERIOD (as I'll never return).
If you're going to keep "Most deals added" you need to figure a way to weight that result with a "Most deals ignored" score so we can tell who's just adding crap to see their name at the top of the list versus who's adding legitimate deals.
Hooray for the Green Boxers!
@phatch: Agreed. I took one glance at the leaderboard and went "ack! That's the wrong incentive!" I'd love to see "Most deals added that became popular" although it probably needs a shorter title like "Added popular deals". (I'm hoping people can infer the "most" part. Maybe there can be a smaller-font explanation at the bottom?)
Hmm. It's a little disconcerting that the highest voted comment is quite devoid of links. I tried to find the comment that was listed as the highest voted one to see the context, and didn't manage to locate it. (I gave up before checking all of the entries in that person's "comments" tab, in part because the comments tab doesn't actually list comments, it lists things that were commented upon. I think.)
Was that deliberate, so people don't just keep voting on the leading comment? If not, a link to the comment in context would be really nice.
Currently, the leaderboard is stretched out beyond the screen. I've come to terms with woot wanting me to scroll back and forth (although I dislike it every bit as much as when it first happened), but currently it comes up (no matter which browser I use) with stuff I can't see off to the viewer's left.
I also suggest that you're making some of the wrong items as statistics. As I'd noted in a previous post (which disappeared rather than getting added, dammit), most people will be tempted to game the system. Let's reward the number of popular/good deals, not total deals (for example).
@shrdlu: Perhaps Woot is changing their pages for the upcoming "widescreen format" revolution that is happening. I can see their page just fine on my 19" LCD TV screen (very similar to todays Sellout.woot) and just fine on my Acer Aspire One. Another option for users is to Zoom out and make it fit on your screen. A little known tool for many. Firefox is View -> Zoom -> Zoom Out or Ctrl--
Join the revolution, kids. I've got oodles of room on all sides in my 1920x1200 resolution.
@shrdlu: Change the size of your screen at the bottom right hand corner of your browser.
@fgarriel: LOL, unfortunately my netbook doesn't have dual 21" LCDs. The whole Ajaxy first view of deals.woot.com is disconcerting at any monitor resolution.
Regarding the leaderboard I agree with former posters that you shouldn't use raw numbers. Factor in votes because submitting 1000 craps deals is a milestone that should not get someone on the front page. Submitting the 25 best deals should.
@dpavlik21: Some people use a lower resolution (my mother, for one) because they are near-blind and that's how they can see the computer screen. She has a nice monitor that she keeps at 800x600. Drives me nuts.
At the very least, websites should be designed for no larger than 1024x768 as the default.
I was very surprised to see that my handle on the leaderboard at all, much less next to 'most deals posted' stat (I'm sure that will quickly change with all the green-boxers coming on board).
I'd just like to point out that I believe all the deals I've posted to be good deals worthy of being voted "popular".
Still, I agree that "most deals posted" isn't the right thing to encourage.
I like the suggestion of "Most Popular Deals Posted".
This is probably way to involved, but I like the idea of a /.-like meta-moderating system. It would obviously need to be tweaked to work here, but that might provide more meaningful feedback by which to rate who is on the leaderboard.
I think that "Most Questions Asked" and "Most Comments Added" are appropriate categories, at least during the Beta testing when woot is looking for feedback and, hopefully, there aren't too many karma-whores that would start a lot of BS threads just to see their name on the leaderboard.
To those concerned about the width of the leaderboard - I'm able to view it just fine on my 14.1" laptop monitor, and my Firefox window isn't even maximized. my laptop's screen resolution is 1280x800.
What are the "rules" on posting the same deal more than once?
@slabraham: If you see a deal repeated - either by the same member (sometimes folks accidentally double-post) or by two different members, hit the "Tattle" button on the most recent post. The default subject is "Duplicate".
Just tattle to the mods and they'll take care of it.
I can see the leaderboard just fine. My rez is 1152 x 864.
I love the ideas here, & I personally feel strongly that the leaderboard (& other things evolved off of it) will be what keep our community coming back. Everyone loves a good game.
Challenge #1 in all of this is figuring out exactly how to incentivize the right (helpful to the community) behaviors & disincentivize the wrong (harmful) ones. Obviously our current counting-stats (purposefully) don't do that at all, so I'm glad to see people suggesting tweaks and new ideas.
Challenge #2 is identifying ways to algorithmically measure, calculate and rank what can sometimes seem subjective goals. This is actually likely the hardest part to get just right & it's what we're puzzling out in response to most of the good thoughts here.
Challenge #3 is naming & describing the scores/stats in an intuitive & extremely brief manner. A high score board is fairly pointless if people can't figure out what it's scoring or how to make it onto the board.
I'll do some @ replies to some of your specific suggestions.
Why does the Leaderboard navigate to the "Community Deals" page then display the leader board? Since is just like the "Add a comment" window, it should do the same thing and pop up whatever screen you are viewing.
Question: What, exactly, determines what a "popular" deal is? Is it based (solely) on "votes"? Or is it based on the number of people who actually purchased the item? Wouldn't PURCHASES be a much better measure of "popularity" than simply the number of VOTES?
I would think the "bottom line" (no pun intended) would be to sell stuff, not just to run a popularity contest ("Oooh! That's a good deal! - too bad I don't have the coin to actually buy one, but if I did, I would!" "I don't really need one of these, but that's a bitchin' good price!")
If it doesn't sell, nobody wins.
Viewing the Leaderboard shouldn't change my screen config from Ask the Wooters back to Community Deals.
@absdmc: There is no real way for Woot to track if an item is purchased from this site.
A deal is determined to be "popular" by how many votes it receives.
@phatch: I'm guessing we won't keep 'most deals added' forever, but I'm not sure how we'd calculate your 'most deals ignored' idea. A deal with no votes & no comments, I guess?
One thought I had was starting your calculated 'score' for a deal / question / comment at -3, so that you actually got penalized, game-wise, for posting something that ended up getting fewer than 3 votes, but I'm worried it could slow down people from posting otherwise helpful info to old questions (feeling like it's unlikely to get noticed and voted up).
@pauldf: Right, the stats up there now are purposefully the wrong incentives, in hopes of getting us all chatting about what and how to do the right ones. We started with "most deals made popular." We had the problems you mentioned (titling it intuitively), but I think it will likely make its way back.
The highest voted comment does need a link to the comment. I'll chat with @shawnmiller about that today.
@absdmc: To help prevent gaming the system, we're not going to completely reveal the algorithm for what determines 'popular' deals, but yes, it involves votes, and yes, it also involves more than just votes.
Would Woot! be able to track the number of "visits" to the product's website, then? That would indicate more than just a "casual" interest, yes?
(No way to get feedback from the website's owner as to now many sales were due to 'referrals' from this website, eh? No way to pass them a cookie, or something?)
@jguthrie: The link to the leaderboard is http://deals.woot.com/?leaderboard and you're correct, that unfortunately takes you away from the "Ask the Wooters" section if you're currently on it. It feels weird that way because it's in a lightbox/modal dialog. I'm think we might want to dedicate a full blown page to the leaderboard if we can come up with enough ideas to fill it up.
Type-o: "Higest Voted Comment."
I would recommend removing the 'more deals' button. I also suggest adding capabilities to gather additional information about a deal by hovering over it. I'm actually partial to how onedealaday has their website established. Only problem with theirs is choppy tagging of items by categories.
@absdmc: At this point, I think I need to say that I enjoy hearing suggestions to various things we could/should take into account, but I'm going to stop short of describing what we are watching for / using, to avoid people shaping their behavior to our algorithm rather than us shaping our algorithm to people's behaviors.
@shawnmiller: I like the idea of a leaderboard dedicated page. Though what to put on it is a very good question.
Is Woot! trying to stay away from the blog/community aspects of the other .woot sites? It seems that there is only one "community" tab compared to the 5 that are on the other .woot sites.
@psyeye: Removing the "more deals" button?? So you would only ever be able to see the latest 10 deals?
@anotherhiggins: No no, I would suggest having a user configurable number of items per page (e.g., 20, 40, 100), and a count of the number of pages at the bottom. Having to click 'more deals' seems unncessary. What situation(s) will there be when someone would not want to see more? The click here to continue approach seems designed into each aspect of deals.woot, including the discussion section. Takes a bit of time to track down what you're looking for, including my original post depending on how the default list is sorted.
@shawnmiller: Making the leaderboard its own page would be a good idea (assuming the space is warranted) and it would make it consistent with the other options along the top of the website.
@psyeye: OK - I totally agree with that. Only having 10 deals visible by default is a problem IMO. There have been busy-ish times even before green-boxers were invited when all 10 spots would fill up in less than an hour. I don't think that gives deals enough visibility.
@dave bug: The highest voted comment now contains a link to the deal or question it comments on (sorted by most votes so it appears first in the list).
@phatch: I agree with Phatch.........because you have the potential for folks adding a lot of junk just to get to the top of the leader board, sort of the 'first' phenom..... ;-) (I hate that) LOL
@dave bug: wroter, "I'm going to stop short of describing what we are watching for / using, to avoid people shaping their behavior to our algorithm rather than us shaping our algorithm to people's behaviors."
No problem there; we're all just trying to make suggestions - not trying to tell you what you should or shouldn't do, nor do I/we expect you to reveal your algorithm.
Here's another thought: if you can't get actual "sales" data, perhaps tracking "click-throughs" to the web-site where the deal is located could be factored in ... ???? At least the "deal" appeared good enough to someone that they visited the site to get more information about the deal.
I like the use of a customer one to five star rating plus comments
also, pro & con. My two cents.
It is rather annoying to have the "leaderboard" immediately cover up the deal page. If I want to see the leaderboard, I will select it. If I select the deals, that's what I want to see.
@RickDuhrkopf: The only way to click on the Leaderboard tab is if you are at the top. Just like the "Add a comment" screen, it will cover over whatever is at the top of your screen.
I do feel that clicking the leaderboard redirects to the sponsored deals page is bad. An issue I brought up earlier.
The leader board should not pop up so much it is pissing me off. please just place it on the front page so everyone can see it..
@B236EN : I don't see what you are saying. I navigate on and off the site and through it all the time and it only pops up when I click on the link. I am using Chrome.
when I go back from looking at one deal, I would prefer to NOT have the leaderboard pop up each time.
@bonuscoyote, @B236EN and other people complaining about seeing the leaderboard all the time:
what browser(s) are you using? We just had a report from @sgoman5674 that it isn't happening in Chrome, and I'm not seeing it in Firefox.
@anotherhiggins: same here about firefox. I did happen to use IE and saw the display width issue at work, which i think has to do with my resolution/screen size.
I still don't like how the Leaderboard redirects to the "community deals" page/view. If I am on the ask the wooters section, that's where i want to stay.
@fgarriel: some of us are old.....and need our resolution going the other direction so we can read....IE big letters...bad enough I have bifocals now.
@sunnyside101: Before you threaten learn how to spell, it is 'lose'.
So far I like it.
Hey guys- So far every page on deals.woot.com is too wide for my screen. I am using a netbook, Acer Aspire One (AOA 110 1588 ZG5) with 9 inch screen. Currently I'm browsing using Windows XP SP3 and Opera 10.01 (because Firefox and IE are way too slow on this SSD only machine - its also only got 1 GB of ram.) Its not too wide by much, but enough to be annoying. Also the text on the buttons on this Add a comment form are not properly vertically centered on the button, the cancel and submit appear in the middle of the top line of each button. Best luck! - NG
the leader board, and the whole site really dosent scale at all. at least for me im checking it on my laptop and i cant even read the first panel (im assumeing there is only one i cant see)
How bout making it where it wont keep popping up every time I check out a deal and come back to the page, there is a link to view it, that is all you need.
@motionb: You should see a "do not show me this" check box.
115 Answers answer
Sort By: