After careful consideration, sir, I've determined your new fancy algorithm sucks...
Sorry w00t, you know I love you - just look at my dedicated buying habit, but deals.woot needs some fixing.
Of the deals currently on the "Sponsored Deals," really only one is a decent deal, and that's the Sellout. The socks are seconds being pushed off on people not willing to read a product description (should be in the TITLE of the offer), the meat is WAA-HAY-HAAAY too expensive for four quarter pound filets, the wine isn't even OFFERED at that site anymore (DEAD LINK), and the chairs MAY be able to hold 1000lbs, but we've seen them before...
The community deals -
Aside from a few decent deals, most of which are "Freebies," the rest are jokes. Astroglide and a thousand dollar monkey suit.
I had words of encouragement here, but your window won't allow this many characters, which is bizarre.
I sincerely hope I'm helping here.
8-Damien
by
maskedmarvel
asked 2 years ago
Well first I love those socks. Given that I pay upwards of 10.00 a pair for running socks - clearly you don't run or you would know that this is the going rate this is an amazing deal for running socks. Who cares if they are factor seconds. They are socks, they still fit. Besides they are for women. Unless you are a woman it shouldn't bother you all that much.
Not all of us like tech deals, which you seem to like if you think that the sellout deal is the best deal. And I think you know they fixed the wine deal. Plus who cares if they have had the sponsored chair deal before? All those vendors PAY for to be in the top five, there is no algorithim for being up there, so maybe you need to rethink your fancy thinking there.
Have to agree with @hobbit about the socks. I usually buy Thorlo running socks. I've found them as low as 9 bucks a pair and been darned glad to pay that.
If I can find decent socks to run in that won't cost me a frippin' arm & a leg, I don't care if they have minor blemishes. As long as it doesn't affect the wear (and it doesn't, according to the description), they'll be covered by my shoes.
That being said, yes, perhaps the fact they were seconds should be mentioned in the description.
And no, the meat is not one of the best deals going. Prime tenderloin (but not Angus) is running around $11.99 a pound in my area.
By & large, the sponsored deals have been fairly good. Granted, I wasn't interested in a lot of it, but last week's Adirondack chair was an absolute steal especially when the ultra good shipping deal was factored in. My delivery arrived Saturday.
Coming up with 4 or 5 stellar deals every single day has GOT to be tough. I'd say cut the staff a little slack here.
@hobbit: Last week there was also a repeat: the bike light from mpgear.com.
@sgoman5674: that seems really random. But okay.
Fantastic effort avoiding my entire point. The deals aren't great. That's obvious. The deal on the monitor is the best up there, whether you want to belittle technology or not. The effort to even CHECK the link on the wine wasn't put forward.
But the Deals listed as popular by the members, and put on the front page, are also not good deals.
If you want people to come to your web page it's got to be competitive against the sites that are doing the same thing, and right now deals.woot is the loser.
@maskedmarvel: Then vote for the deals you like that is how they become popular. If you don't like it then don't come here. Those of us who like woot are quite happy here.
@hobbit: "If I don't like woot don't come here" is exactly what's happening. Do you have anything constructive to add to my question here? Look at the top deals for the week, hobbit, and tell me those are a reason to visit this site. The SYSTEM isn't working.
@maskedmarvel: Umm, it's not the systems fault, but more of the fault of the majority of the people here. They are the ones that vote up what hits popular because they find it amusing without considering whether it is a deal or not.
@catbertthegreat: Well, I agree to a point. But perhaps there should be tighter moderation on those deals that are making the front page? Hobbit wants me to search out and vote, which I don't mind doing for things I know i'm looking for. But lots of deals come our way that we didn't expect. Indeed, it's how I ended up finding woot years ago.
Basing a ranking solely on it's popularity is going to result in what you have: people voting up jokes that are in only a very small way part of your goal.
@maskedmarvel: Instead of complaining be part of the solution That is what me, catbertthegreat, shrdlu, wootvan and many others have done we have been part of the solution instead of coming in here and telling woot it sucks in our ask post. Find and post deals you like and maybe we will vote them up, oh wait I won't do that you are mean because, telling woot they suck isn't making you friends.
I can tell you right now deals you post I probably won't vote for right now because of your current attitude, I will truly go out of my way to not vote for your deals regardless of how great they might be.
While I disagree with many of the points that were made in the original question, there IS one significant thing that is a game changer, and not for the better.
Whereas, Sellout victims are now redirected to Deals, and whereas many of those folks are seasoned veterans of Woot, and also able to vote, and whereas they are only interested, by and large, in the item they came to purchase, the Sellout item will ALWAYS receive the most votes.
It makes the Leaderboard section on "Yesterday's Sponsored Pick" a slam dunk. Consistently. I'm not sure, but I suspect, if I were someone who'd paid for space as a Sponsored Deal, and figured that top billing as yesterday's best was an extra day of money, that I'd be happy to know that it would be nearly impossible for me to achieve that second day's worth of sales. I suppose it isn't any more valid than other items on the Leaderboard, but it certainly gives one pause.
@shrdlu: Re: "ALWAYS".
Last Sunday (Day 2), the Sellout Item was Ranked Number 3 for most of the day.
Hello shrdlu. I used to be someone else. (jsjohnson64)
I am still Woot Staff and I'm enjoying this discussion.
Thank you all for pitching in on this.
@jumbowoot: Ohhhhh. Hi! (shrdlu waves) Please buy something. Anything. I usually ignore comments when the vote is zero, unless I'm not busy (which is going to be less and less likely as other things engage my attention).
Still, I would think it would be better to remove the Sellout item from making the top voted item list. Those other folks have given money to be there, and that second day of sales, while much smaller, is rather like a reward (so to speak) for being more appreciated than the other items.
Also, did you see my responses here?
@hobbit: There's my name - write it down so you you don't forget::::---->
I don't think woot sucks. I think DEALS.woot sucks. If anyone is in the market for a fighter jet, I suppose they should come here. If anyone can explain why that's a "best deal" of the week, I'll start understanding how the system and algorithm works. If anyone, especially you hobbit, can can make an argument that puts the two things together, then I'll start thinking differently.
@jumbowoot: Thanks for pitching in! Nice to know staff is watching out for us!
@maskedmarvel: You are getting tiresome. I guess you just wanted to argue with someone. These people you are trying to pick on have volunteered. They are trying to help people. They are trying to make the experience on deals dot woot better.
If you do not like the way this site works, you do not have to be here. No one is holding a gun to your head.
@maskedmarvel: It's fine that you think Deals is not wonderful. It's more helpful if you try to solve things, instead of complaining. You know what they say:
Grant me the serenity
To accept the things I cannot change;
The courage to change the things that I can;
And the wisdom to know the difference
Not a fan, necessarily, of some groups that claim to espouse that, but very much a fan of understanding where you might have an effect, and where you are just spinning your wheels. In other words, sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug.
@maskedmarvel: Aside from the freebies and the obvious jokes deals, there ARE decent deals to be found amongst the dross. Part of the issue may be what interests you as a great deal differs drastically from what interests others.
Of the deals you've posted, the Kohls and Borders deals interested me, but that was it. I don't play the guitar, don't golf, etc. Does that mean your deals suck? No. They just didn't pique my interest. They didn't seem to strike a chord with the crowd that has frequented deals.woot over the last month either (apologies if that sounded bitchy).
If you look at the crap I've put up, & yes, A LOT of it was crap, but popular crap. Several of them hit popular within hours, surprised the heck out of me. Probably interested you very little. Does that mean I shouldn't post the deals because most weren't electronic, athletic, or intelligently oriented or savvy? You tell me.
Constructive criticism is great but what are YOUR SUGGESTIONS TO IMPROVE the experience?
@lavikinga: Fair statements, questions, and no apologies necessary.
There needs to be tighter moderation of the front page. I'm a fan of the way SlickDeals does it - there's a FRONTPAGE section, moderated and approved by dedicated volunteers, that I know I can look at and rely upon as good offers to consider.
There are also a few deals listed as "hot Topics" and "Up and Coming." These newer deals are worth looking at, and some of them ARE jokes. The criteria for getting listed there? I assume it's page views, ratings, and replies.
I'm not saying this is slickdeals. The model is similar, though.
One thing they do that I think is worthy of consideration is that ratings cannot be offered by members without viewing the actual thread. No just rambling through a list and checking things you think are worth a thumb up. Also - deal ratings go both ways, not just up. Helps a thread be moderated by the members with more ease, and more easily weed out the immediately unworthy.
@lavikinga: Something that keeps getting overlooked and I prolly didn't articulate well is that the QUALITY of the deal is my problem here. Those deals yesterday that I mentioned were all of a low quality. Yes - there are good ones to be had, and the search function seems to work well if I'm looking for anything in particular. The majority of the deals yesterday were not good deals, period.
I post deals i think may interest others as they did me, and if I don't see the deal already posted. That's where my committment stops for that. If my deals suck, they shoud be voted down into the ground never to return. If they're great, they deserve to make it to the front page. Since when have woot members been afraid to give the company the business when it came to offers that weren't GREAT deals? Why should we start now?
Thanks.
@maskedmarvel: I used to think the option of voting deals down would be a good thing, until I ran across a few wanker individuals. I realized then some one with an ax to grind against me could really skew things in a bad way. So what doesn't interest me, I don't vote for (although doing that means I'm denying possible good deals a vote). For truly tasteless deals, there's the Tattle tab.
Yes, Deals.Woot has a more casual attitude & criteria for deals. It's kind of a free-for-all and it's less structured. Maybe it was planned that way on purpose? Let the vox populi rule. Of course, some days bedlam rules instead. But I like it. It's like relatives. You don't have to like them, but they ARE family. And that means, you don't have to visit every day or even every week if deals.woot gets on your nerves, but do breeze in now and again.
Nothing's set in stone and this place will evolve (or devolve) over time. Give it time and keep up with constructive ideas for improvement.
21 Answers answer
Sort By: