dealshp pavilion p7 desktop with 1tb hard drive and…

92 +96 -4

by brutherford
added 3 months ago

vote-for7vote-against

Good PC for the price. As others often point out on these refurb HP's, with a better Power Supply you could add a dedicated graphics card and have a great gaming PC.

vote-for2vote-against

Would this be a decent start to a moderately priced, mid-level gaming PC?

vote-for2vote-against

@lpsession: You answered my question as I was commenting. Thanks! I don't know much about PC gaming. What would be the cost estimate for the power supply and graphics card upgrade to make this a decent rig? Would it be capable of running games like Battlefield 3 pretty well?

vote-for5vote-against

@wnyx585am: Certainly. You're looking at around $200 for a graphics card and power supply to support it. Just shop around and find a good deal on the graphics card and then buy the power supply to match it accordingly. All the other specs on the PC are solid for gaming so the more you spend on your graphics card the higher your settings can be for high FPS on games like BF3.

Example of a low budget option to run BF3 on ultra with 30 or so FPS (according to reviews) and a solid Power Supply:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102908
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139028

vote-for3vote-against

@wnyx585am: it definately, it has nice room in the RAM department. It also has a quadcore which is very handy. a nice video card as mentioned is about 200 bucks. but you can find deals on even those if you keep a good look out on like newegg. the brand new line of video cards are due out next month which means prices should drop very soon.

vote-for1vote-against

The only thing you have to be careful about is if these things use proprietary PSUs. I know older Dells used to have them, and if you tried to plug in a PSU not from Dell you'd wind up frying everything.

vote-for1vote-against

Can't you get this same rig (with 4GB RAM instead of 8) during a woot off for $100 less? Think I'll wait.

vote-for3vote-against

@racinreaver: Most of the time they are using basically COTS components so you can upgrade/change with out having to use only OEM stuff.

However, by the time you put in a new quality PSU & video card in this, you can build your own for right around the same price. If you think your skillful enough to upgrade those components then really look into building your own. Of course, you won't get all that great (rollseyes) pre-installed software.

vote-for-11vote-against

I owned two hp laptops and they have overheating problems, I had to buy replacement chargers and batteries for each of them and they are nothing but trouble. I owned two HP printers, one I still use and they cause frequent paper jams. Trust me, stay away from HP products.

I built a 500 dollar budget pc for a friend that will outperform what this thing has to offer and everything is brand new. Here's a list of things I bought to build the pc. (note that this build was made a few months ago and some are priced after rebate)

MSI P67A-GD65 $140 MIR
Corsair Vengeance 2X 8GB 1600MHZ $25 MIR
700W cooler master Power supply $50
Intel i3-2100 $120
Asus DVD-R $20
Tower $50
Antec Cooling fans $8 each. X3
Hitachi 1TB HDD $120 (he bought it when the flood concern happened)

Estimated total: $549

Currently he is able to upgrade further (cpu, gpu, aftermarket heatsink) but it's based on how you plan to use it.

vote-for3vote-against

there are only a few problems with turning this into a gaming machine. The first is that the processor is a 2.1ghz, and the 8gb of ram is ddr3 1333, not 1600.

it will run it, but don't be expecting to max the settings..

last, the highest settings on BF3 really need a video card with 2gb of vram. Lower settings obviously dont.

vote-for3vote-against

My gaming PC is a little more than 4 years old and granted I am not running BF3, but it still performs 30-40 FPS on SWTOR or WOW with most every setting high or max. I could do better if I upgraded the RAM or gcard, but it works for as little gaming time as I have. It is running a quad q6600 processor, 4GB DDR2 800 RAM and a 9600GT gcard. Point is, you could get a $100 gcard and be good for a few years. I guess it depends on your budget and intentions. If you want it to last a while and can afford it, go with a better card, if you are on a tighter budget, you could get away with a less expensive card.
Some good links for comparison on gcard from Tom's Hardware:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-graphics-card-review,3107.html - Best GCard for the money Feb 2012
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-graphics-card-review,3107-7.html - GCard Hierarchy Chart, if upgrading try to go 3-5 steps up minimum.

vote-for2vote-against

@szetoa: not sure why the thumbs down, but for the money you would spend on this unit ($400) and upgrading the PSU ($50) and GCard ($100-$200), building a machine isn't a bad comparison. That is assuming you are comfortable building one or know someone that is - either way you'd be messing with the hardware replacing parts.

I have HP machines at work and have seen some personal use around me and mostly have good experiences with them. I've seen more issues with Dell laptops, but I guess if you survey owners of every brand, there will always be some with bad experiences.

vote-for2vote-against

We have this machine. Paired it up with a wide screen from secondipity. Total system cost of under $500 delivered. The kids actually fight over who gets to use it rather than the other machines available in the house.

While it is not used for graphic intensive gaming, the flash gaming that the kids do works very well.

All and all... Very pleased with it once the bloatware was deleted.

vote-for1vote-against

@sumduud: I'm always in favor of building your own. I gave Szetoa thumbs down because he didn't take into account an OS ($100) and a keyboard/mouse (around $40). That takes the total closer to $700. When I'm talking to friends about building their own, the cost of an OS is almost always overlooked.

edit: Your pc is almost the exact same thing I'm running! I even ran a 9600gt for a while.

vote-for1vote-against

@eastonfrost: If you have an OS copy from an older machine use that. As long as the old machine is out of service ( or you can put linux or something free on that older PC) it is legal.

vote-for1vote-against

Looking for a new computer not for gaming but just business applications, such as excel, word and quickbooks. any suggestions?

vote-for-2vote-against

@sumduud: yea I don't get it either. I bet the people the thumbed it down are either ignorant or just hardcore fans of HP. Building a computer is not hard and it's rewarding because you get everything you want. Buying one off the shelf has limited potential and capabilities. Sure you can upgrade psu and add a gpu on it, but can you do any extensive overclocking and other things that a custom computer can do? This computer that's posted is a REFURBISHED 400 dollar pc that won't be on par with the pcs you can build now. Save the trouble and invest on something that cost a bit more that will last longer.

vote-for1vote-against

@dadmicfly: If you're looking for a desktop computer something like this is a good option, given that you don't want to build it yourself. This is a nice computer for basic use, to make it gaming you'd have to buy extra.

vote-for5vote-against

@szetoa: Alot of people don't have either the time nor knowledge to build a comparable machine for $300. (Yes, $300 because few people have an OS just lying around.) Others don't have the patience to search the ends of the Earth for each and every part, trying to get a deal. This machine is a good deal for them, not you.

As a comparative, you can cook a steak, burger, or anything else at home to your exact liking for less than going out, but lots of restaurants exist and are doing well. Choice is a great thing.

vote-for3vote-against

@szetoa:

You would be better off buying this $300 and dropping in a GPU and power supply for maybe $200 more. You would be spending $600 total and have a PC capable of running any current game at decent settings and resolution.

Your build doesn't include a GPU or an operating system, so adding those would put you over $700. Plus you would have to have the time and knowledge of being able to build the entire thing, install proper drivers, etc.

And this processor has a higher benchmark than the i3 2100.

vote-for2vote-against

If it means anything; I purchased a refurb HP tower from new egg 3 1/2 years ago and have had no real problems with it.

And for overheating? My tower has been running in excess of 200 days now.

vote-for4vote-against

@lordhewlett: I second this. I have an HP pavilion tower that I bought in 2002 that is still going strong. One hard drive clicked out about six months ago. I've added ram and a video card but the beast has been running constantly all day every day for Almost ten full years now. I reboot about once a month when the power goes out. Apart from that its always on. Don't know where all this hate is coming from. I have had a couple HP printers that all worked very well unitil I upgraded. And lastly an HP laptop Ghats been working fine since 2005 or so

vote-for4vote-against

@szetoa: If you want to know why people are voting you down, it's likely because you're coming off as arrogant. You're taking your very limited life experience and trying to generalize every person to being able to fit into a group that has the same needs as you. As others pointed out, not everyone has time or knowledge to build a computer. Also, you didn't budget for an OS. If someone doesn't know how to build a PC, they're not going to know how to pirate and install and OS (which I assume is what you're basically suggesting by not even considering the cost of the OS). As far as HP machines go, EVERY brand has bad models. I am typing this on an HP Netbook that has taken quite a few beatings in the field, and has zero problems after almost 3 years. CLEARLY not all HP's are bad.

vote-for1vote-against

@eastonfrost: Good point, I tend to forget about the OS because I just recycle my own. That and I quite building for friends, because I got sick of playing tech support when they would do something to the machine. As for the mouse and keyboard I will use an existing, since I have far too many. But from a point where you are starting fresh, those must be considered.

vote-for1vote-against

two days it's been up

two days I've been anguished over getting it

I don't REALLY need a computer for downstairs do I?

Woot people, give me guidance

vote-for0vote-against

I've got to say that if you're just going to be surfing the internet and/or just some office/business work, this computer would be well worth the price to buy. Most work oriented software are just starting to take dual core cpu's into account, so quad cores would actually be over the top for at least this year. I'm not saying you can run the newest autocad application, or similar products without a hiccup or two, but lightroom3, photshop elements and the like would work fine on this system.

For gaming, for example, battlefield 3, you would definately need a good videocard, as stated above, a larger power supply to go with it. Something along the lines of a NVidia 420 or better to be on medium settings would be all you really would need to play bf3.

I'd reccomend syating away from overclocked videocards with this computer as it seems bf3 has some issues with them.

vote-for0vote-against

The only gripe I would have is the OS, it doesn't really need to be x64, most day to day users get by on x32, plus few software designers have jumped on the x64 bandwagon. Please check to see if your software user will be compatable with 64 bit win7.

vote-for1vote-against

@chalion: Can you share your datapoints that support your claim that 64-bit as an architecture is a "bandwagon"?I'm fairly certain it's the next step in the evolution of the personal and enterprise computing infrastructure.

A 32-bit OS is incapable of addressing more than 4GB of addressable memory (the amount of actual RAM 32-bit Windows can access is 3.25 GB, in actuality, as the remaining memory is dedicated to certain hardware devices), whereas a 64-bit OS can address up to 1TB of both physical and addressable memory.

But it's not only memory usage that increases. 64-bit Windows is more secure, more scalable and supports virtualization...things a casual user may not understand or care about, but that which benefits them nonetheless.

Windows 7 64-bit is absolutely appropriate for this system and necessary to take advantage of this system's hardware configuration.

vote-for1vote-against

@chalion: Furthermore, your assertion that a quad-core processor is only leveraged by software that is written for it is very myopic.

The largest boost in performance will likely be noticed in improved response-time while running CPU-intensive processes like antivirus scans, ripping/burning media (requiring file conversion) or file searching. For example, if the automatic virus-scan runs while a movie is being watched, the application running the movie is far less likely to be starved of processor power, as the antivirus program will be assigned to a different processor core than the one running the movie playback.

Not trying to be rude here, but honestly, where do you get your information?